What struck me in the video and Edutopia reading?
Can I just say that I went to work and shared Dr Judy Willis’
video with my colleagues; in the context of my work environment (tertiary
education, welfare and disability support), I found the idea of particular learned
behaviours (fight, flight and freeze responses) being masked by ‘diagnoses’ especially
enlightening. When examining these in
light of Rubenstein’s contention that “the act of learning can change the brain”,
we are provided with the idea that we may be able to manage some behaviours in
the classroom by providing supportive and inclusive learning experiences where students
who feel safe/secure may be less inclined to have a fight/flight/freeze response.
Implications for my classroom - In the broadest sense my
take home message from Dr Willis’s video and Rubenstein’s Edutopia reading is
that we not only need to be aware of the multiple literacies, and learning
types (and likely multiple intelligences) of our learners, but we need to
ensure that our pedagogy accounts for these dynamics. It is not hard to take a
look at the lead causes of stress in school that Dr Willis has identified and attribute
these as symptoms of a non-inclusive, non-supportive learning environment.
Benefits of using ITC in my classroom - I really like the
idea of encouraging reflective, rather than reactive learning and teaching, and
I believe that ICT provides us with unique opportunities to implement reflective
teaching via digital technologies in a classroom environment. By designing
scaffolded multi-sensory lessons and focussing on developing “weaker” skills, we
may be able to help our learners develop each of the different areas of the
brain. By giving learners the opportunity to learn within different modes, we
are able to support different learning styles and help our learners develop
their identities.
What shortcomings do I experience in the traditional
classroom and curriculum?
To preface my criticism of traditional classrooms and curriculum,
I would like to first say that I absolutely LOVE the TED presentation from Sir
Ken Robinson; it is actually a filler-resource I had previously used with
students in a Tertiary Prep Course to introduce them to the idea of embracing multiple
intelligences and multiple literacies – something that we as teachers will have
the opportunity to foster and explore with our learners. I particularly love
the idea of moving away from the stigma associated with being ‘wrong’.
I believe that the traditional classroom and curriculum are
particularly inhibited by this concept of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ answers, and
personally feel that the stigma associated with being a ‘failure’ is an
inherent flaw in education. While our learners are at fundamental phases in
their psychological development, focus should be on developing ‘whole persons’,
not just literate persons.
To give a personal example of what I believe it means to
develop a ‘whole person’, my Math B Teacher had a favourite quote “Rachelle,
have courage in your convictions”; obviously Math was not my strongest subject,
but what I learnt in this class were lessons I have continued to apply in life.
1 - it is OK to get things wrong, often
these are the most effective learning experiences; 2 – be confident in yourself,
take a chance and trust that you will learn (eventually).
Hi Rachelle, this was a very thought-provoking post, and gave me, in particular, a lot to think about! Thank you for your insights. (Great video!)
ReplyDelete